The AI layoffs end in 12 months and I know why

发布时间    来源
Episode 设置




中英文字稿     

在最近的Cloudflare财报中,CEO马修·普林斯(Matthew Prince)——也就是那个拍了这张照片并发布在X平台上却没有删除的人——宣布了两件事。首先,公司在其16年的历史中实现了最佳季度,收入达6.39亿美元。其次,他宣布裁员1100人,这个数字离他最初想达到的目标只有一点点,但他的员工阻止了他。他开玩笑地说,他本来想裁掉11个员工,以再次达到1.1.1.1的数字,但员工劝他放弃。于是,他在电话会议上说道:“祝贺团队,我们创造了公司历史上最好的季度,同时也要告诉你们,我们将裁掉五分之一的员工。感谢你们的辛勤工作,这是你们的遣散费。” 一位分析师在会上问了一个显而易见的问题:“马修,如果你们刚刚拥有了最好的季度表现,为什么还要裁掉这么多人?”他回答:“仅仅因为你很健康,并不意味着你不能变得更健康。”这位CEO现在说话听起来像个私人教练,好像读过戴维·戈金斯(David Goggins)的书,现在在谈论纪律的艺术。对不起,人们,我把裁员描述得像个锻炼计划,是啊,我们今天练胸肌、肱三头肌和裁员1100人,明天我肯定会很酸痛。他还继续说道:“感谢马修的坦诚,他说员工们的生产力已经提高了100倍。”兄弟,100倍啊!你再看看任何一个Cloudflare的员工,那简直是100倍的提升,我努力不说脏话,但已经说了吧? 更糟糕的是,他把员工比作螺丝刀,他说这就像从手动螺丝刀进化到了电动螺丝刀,而这段话的观众中,有裁员的员工及其家属正在听着。Cloudflare一位工程师的妻子听到了她的丈夫被称作螺丝刀,对家人来说,这真是太打击人了。这位CEO好像在说,“不,不是你被解雇,而是我们现在需要十字螺丝刀,而不是平头的。” 不过,他提到了一件非常重要的事情,也是本视频的主要论点。每当我们看到这些裁员时,作为观察者,我们总能察觉到市场在寻找什么信号。马修表示,那些直接编写代码的人的生产力提升非常显著,而很多支持角色将不再是推动公司发展的角色。
▶ 英文原文
on the recent cloudflare earnings ceo matthew prince also known as the guy that took this picture and posted it on x and did not delete it uh announced two things in the same breath one is that the company had its best quarter in its 16 year history 639 million dollars in revenue two he announced that he was laying off 1100 people which is just shy of the number matthew tried to go for but his his staff stopped him he's like he wanted that 1.1.1.1 again he wanted to lay off 11 more people but they're like come on matthew and so he's like yeah you know he went on this call and he's like congratulations team we had our best quarter in the history of the company and also we're firing one in five of you so thank you thank you all for your hard work here is your severance and an analyst asked him on the call the obvious question he's like matthew if you just had your best quarter ever why are you firing this many people and he said just because you're fit it doesn't mean you can't get fitter this dude is talking like a personal trainer now dude he's like read a david goggins book and now he's you know talking about the art of discipline sorry humans my guy describing their layoff like it's a workout split yeah we're doing chest triceps and 1100 layoffs today i'm gonna be so sore tomorrow and he kept going he didn't stop there uh thank you matthew for the transparency uh he said that his employees have become 100 times more productive bro 100 times dude you take any given cloudflare employee and you 100x that son of a you 100x that son of a son of a gun and uh i'm trying not to swear here did i already swear i'm not actually sure trying to imagine what 100x jesus christ but that wasn't even the worst part he said it's like going from a manual to an electric screwdriver this guy compared his employees to a screwdriver bro and like you know the laid off employees are listening the families are listening dude and and cloudflare engineer's wife is listening to her husband being called a screwdriver i mean this is devastating man this dude is comparing your husband to a black and decker bro and he's like no no you're not fired you're more of a flathead and we're looking for a phillips but he said one thing that is really really important and is the main thesis of this video whenever we have these layoffs there's always this little tell this little signal that we get as observers as to what the market is looking for and here's what matthew said he said the productivity gains from the people directly creating code have been incredible and a lot of the support roles behind them are not going to be the roles that drive companies going forward.

现在提到“支持角色”这个词,容易让人误以为是在说客服或者其他类似的事情,但这并不是他所指的。实际上,他所说的“支持角色”是指,过去30年来,公司需要雇佣储备力量。就像在运动队中,你有五个首发选手,其他人坐在替补席上。替补球员的作用就是,如果主力球员受伤或在比赛中途疲累,你可以用替补来替换他们。尤其是在小公司中,一个员工可能掌握了大量的知识,如果他们辞职或休假,公司就会感到恐慌。所以,公司会雇佣“冗员”,也就是替补,他们被培训好,但平时并不做很多事情,主要是用来保留知识。这基本上就是一种保险措施。 然而,现在公司发现不再需要这些替补了,因为有了一种新的替代方案。比如说有一个叫"Claude"的工具,可以扮演这种支持角色的替代者。如果你需要一个普通水平的开发者,Claude可以帮忙。想象一下,如果以前主力员工辞职,公司会陷入困境,但现在,只需要启动一个Claude实例,问问题,你就能应付过去。当然,这不可能是完美的。这就是Matthew所指的“支持角色”的新含义。
▶ 英文原文
now the word support roles it's easy to read that or to hear that and just and think he's talking about customer service or something that's not what he means dude what he means by support roles is that you know for 30 years companies have had to hire reserves you had the starters you had the five starters and you had everyone else on the bench and the point of the players on the bench was so that if one of your star players is injured or tires out in the middle of the game you swap them out if your star player quit or went on vacation or something this was a really scary thing for a lot of companies especially smaller companies where one person held a shit ton of institutional knowledge so you'd have to hire like redundancy like backups who get onboarded and don't really do much other than just hold the knowledge it was basically insurance but what companies have now sort of noticed is that you don't need a bench anymore in a sense you don't need these backups because claude is the backup you know if you're looking for a mediocre dev look no further than claude dude like you know imagine your star player quits before you'd be screwed now you just open up a claude instance and you ask questions you can get by right it's not going to be perfect and so that's what matthew meant by support roles.

如果故事到这里就结束了,那我们就麻烦大了,你也有麻烦,我们所有人都可能会陷入困境。但有一个人救了我们,他的名字是杰文斯——最后的“s”是他名字的一部分。他是一个维多利亚时代的人,1882年去世的。1865年,他注意到当蒸汽机变得更加高效时,对煤的需求反而上升了,而不是下降。每个人都在引用杰文斯悖论,他们说:“伙计们,这确实不符合直觉,但软件的需求会增加,我们将制作50倍、10倍、甚至50倍更多的软件。”我听到这里就有些疑惑,你是说要将现在的软件量增加到50倍吗?你是疯了吗?我已经够多软件了,我想要的是更好的软件,而不是更多软件。想象一下,50倍的软件量是怎样的?50倍的应用程序在我的主屏幕上,50倍的通知,50倍的错误,我可不想要这些。我认为这种解释过于简单了,我想为你提供一个不同的视角去看待杰文斯悖论。问题是,如果杰文斯对人工智能的观点是正确的,那为什么会这样?我们现在没有直觉地理解到什么?我们忽略了什么?答案是软件的长尾效应。
▶ 英文原文
now if the story ended here we would be screwed you would be screwed we'd all sort of be screwed here but there's one man who saves us all here his name is well his last name is is jevons the s is part of his name so he is a victorian dude he died in 1882 in 1865 he noticed that when the steam engine got more efficient the demand for coal went up not down everyone sort of quotes jevons paradox and they say look guys i know it's it's unintuitive right now and i know we can't imagine it but demand for software will go up we're going to be making 50 times more 10x more software 50x more software and i'm like hearing that and i'm like dude what do you mean by 50x more software like you want to take the current state of software and 50x that in volume like are you out of your mind dude like i have enough software i want better software i want less software dude 50x more like 50x more apps on my home screen 50x more notifications 50x more bugs i don't want any of that i think that's a naive interpretation and i want to offer you a different interpretation of jevons paradox the question is if jevons turns out to be right about ai why right what aren't we intuiting right now what are we missing and the answer is the long tail of software.

每家公司都有一个无穷无尽的软件开发清单,不论是对外的还是内部使用的。但是,很多情况下,内部软件往往未能实现。团队可能需要一个仪表盘、自动化工具、Slack机器人或者临时工具,想开发的东西很多,但这些都很难获得预算支持。你很难将内部工具纳入某个季度的目标和关键结果(OKR)中,它们从来都不如公司的核心产品那么优先。因此,公司内部对软件有大量未被满足的需求。而我认为这一需求现在得到了满足。不可否认,AI在构建不太关注质量的临时工具方面非常出色,比如内部仪表盘,一直以来都是个噩梦,质量最差、最过时,没有人愿意去处理。AI将成为内部工具的救星,大多数公司尚未意识到这一点,也还未弄清楚如何利用所谓的效率提升。
▶ 英文原文
every company has like an infinite list of software they want to build whether externally or internally but in a lot of cases internal software just doesn't get built all together you have teams that want a dashboard that want an automation that want a slack bot that wants a ad hoc tool there's so much that wants to be built but can never ever be budgeted you can never get an internal tool to fit into some quarters okrs or something it never matches the priority of your actual core product and so there's just a shit ton of pent-up demand internally in companies for software that that has never been met and i think that demand gets met now there's no denying that ai is very good at building ad hoc tools that you don't really care about their quality necessary like internal dashboards historically have been an absolute horror show like the worst quality the most outdated nobody wants to work on it ai is going to be a godsend for internal tools and most companies haven't realized this they haven't realized yet or figured out yet how to take advantage of the so-called efficiency gains.

我觉得通常很多公司在遇到困难时,会选择减少负担。当公司想要转型时,团队规模小一些会更容易调整。在这种情况下,你可以有两种选择:第一,你可以耐心等待。如果你正在工作或找工作,我不是说你真的要等待,我只是用这种方式来阐述观点,以免我接下来要说的让你不满。 如果你不想等待,那么你应该做的就是与众不同。知道吗,每个人的简历上都会写自己是AI高手,你要确保你的简历上也有类似的信息,比如你能够像Boris那样协调10个代理。每次他参加播客时,都在谈论自己如何在赶往采访的路上,用手机完成了300个代码请求。这就是大家想看到的内容。我真希望你也这样写。
▶ 英文原文
but i think generally what a lot of companies do is that when they are having a hard time steering the ship you lessen the load of the ship when companies want to make a pivot it's much easier to do that with a smaller team there's two things you could do here one is you wait you practice patience if you're somebody in a job you're somebody looking for a job this is a rhetorical what i'm saying is rhetorical i don't actually expect you to wait but i want to make this case just because when i say the next thing you don't get upset now if you don't want to wait here's what you have to do you have to differentiate you know everyone on their resume is like i hope you're putting on your resume that you are an ai wizard that you can orchestrate 10 agents like boris every podcast he goes on he talks about how he did 300 pull requests just today on the way on the uber to the podcast interview he from his phone he fired off 300 pull requests that's what people want man i hope you're saying something like that.

谈到Cloudflare,其中一位被裁掉的工程师在Hacker News的帖子上发表评论说:“天哪,看起来我就是受影响的人之一。这里是我的网站链接,上面有我的简历。” 在这个网站上,这位工程师表示:“我非常乐意使用AI,但我也可以手动完成工作。” 他的意思是希望雇主看到后会觉得:“哇,这个人真的很厉害,他们既能用AI也能手动做,这是我想要的。” 但我认为这不对,我觉得你应该这样说:“虽然我可以手动编程,但在过去的12个月中,我通过完全使用AI将工作效率提高了10到100倍。我有一个专有的代理编排系统,可以让我提交的拉取请求比传奇人物Boris还要多。” 不管这是真是假,先找到工作,然后再填补空白。实际上,要管理10个代理并不难,你只需要启动一个云实例,然后运行10个代理就可以了,这都很简单。AI代理编排没有技术含量,但CEO们不知道这一点,所以你可以利用这一点。
▶ 英文原文
speaking of cloudflare one of the engineers who got laid off uh he posted a comment to hacker news on the on the thread and he says you know yikes looks like i was one of the persons affected here's a link to my website where i have my resume and in this website he or she or they said i'm more than happy to use ai but also i could do things by hand and i think you know the idea was that an employer reading that would think oh wow this person is really impressive like wow they could do both that's what i want i want someone that could do ai and can someone do it by hand i i think that's wrong i don't think that's what you want to be saying but i think what you want to be saying instead is while i can code by hand i have in the last 12 months 10 100x my throughput by using exclusively ai i have a proprietary agent orchestration system that lets me ship more pull requests than the man the legend boris himself whether it's true or not well you know get the job first and then fill in the gaps you know you can you can easily make it true it's not that hard to manage 10 agents bro you just you tell you open up one cloud instance and you're like spin up 10 agents there you go it's all pretty easy it there's no skill to it there's no skill to ai agent orchestration bro but the ceos don't know that so you can take advantage of that.

每个人都不擅长的事情,就是给人留下深刻印象,从而脱颖而出,让自己的名字成为众人关注的焦点。在过去的20年里,这一直都是工作的基石。对我个人来说,我几乎雇佣的每一个人都有自己的网站,对我而言这非常重要。你需要有一个让自己值得骄傲的东西,这个东西代表你,你要去维护它。通过网站的设计,我可以很好地了解你的价值观和信念,而这些是简历中无法传达的。所以,如果你现在还没有个人网站,那真的没有理由,因为这个过程只需十分钟。你可以在那里进行一些思想领导,展示你的兴趣。过去,70%的重点是技能,而30%是开发者们不喜欢去做的事情。但我认为现在的平衡已经改变了,现在是70%的关注、营销和自我定位,30%的技能。这个视频不是告诉你如何专注于这70%,而只是让你知道现在的平衡已经改变了。如果你仍然只专注于技能方面,你可能还没意识到这一点。但如果你什么都不想做,也不必勉强自己。等着“杰文斯悖论”显现出来,人们会求着你回来的。
▶ 英文原文
the one thing everyone sucks at is making an impression standing out getting their name on top of the pile this has been the playbook for 20 years personally for me almost everyone i hired had a personal website that's very important to me like you have to have something that you're proud of that you put your name on that you maintain that represents you like i look at a website and just by its design i get a a really good sense of of everything that you stand for that i don't get from your resume and so if you don't have a personal website today there's really no excuse it'll take you like 10 minutes dude do some thought leadership there you know show that you have interests of some sort but it used to be that it was almost like 70 skill and maybe 30 all this shit that devs don't like to do and i think now the balance has shifted it's 70 attention marketing positioning yourself and 30 skill this video isn't about tips about how to focus on the 70 it's rather just to inform you that that's the balance now it has shifted and if you're still sort of focused on the skill side of things you might not have gotten the memo but again you don't have to do anything if you don't want to do anything bro wait for jevin's paradox to kick in and they'll be begging you to come back.

我们只是还不知道具体什么时候会发生这种情况,大概资本主义的周期会走得很快。一旦他们用尽了现有的劳动力,他们就会意识到需要更多的人。这就是每家公司都会遇到的情况,每个人总是在说“我们需要更多的人,我们需要更多的人”。目前,人们可能会说让我们试试减少人力,但最终,根据杰文斯悖论,我们还是需要更多的人。我希望在未来的视频中能提供更多具体的建议,帮助大家真正利用这次动态变化。谢谢观看。
▶ 英文原文
we just don't know when that will be presumably the capitalism cycle moves pretty quick once they max out with their current labor pool they are going to be like okay we need more people we need more people that's every company you've ever worked at everyone's always saying we need more people we need more people temporarily now people are saying let's try less people but eventually jevin's paradox says we need more people and i hope to cover more of the concrete tips on actually how to take advantage of this change in dynamics in a future video thanks for.