Hello my friends, today is March 21st and this is March it's weekly. Alright, before we begin, I have a very special announcement to make. Today, I am officially launching the second edition to Central Banking 101. As many of you know, the first edition was published in early 2021 and between then and now a lot of things have happened. So the second edition updates the data on the charts, but also talks a lot about the things that happened between then and now. For example, the transition from a library to sofa, run on Silicon Valley Bank, Treasury buybacks, learning how to read the Treasury Refunding announcement and so forth. So overall, it's about 15% more content, but you also notice that the book, the dimensions are physically larger and it looks more professionally done. Actually, I think if I dropped this at Barnes & Noble, people would not think that this is something that was self-published.
Now, my first book, I wrote myself and I self-published and it was X-SexS. So you may not know this, but it's actually very rare for books to become success. Even those picked up by publishers with their marketing network. Now, I know I owe the success to all of you guys, especially the financial Twitter community. So as a token of my gratitude, I'm launching this at a 50% discount. Normally CB101 is $20, but now it's going to be on sale for $10 for the sale of the next week or two. And I will send out an email to my newsletter subscribers about this soon. So thanks so much for your support and hopefully you will enjoy this edition as well. Alright, now back to our regular programming.
So again, this past week was a very exciting week. We had huge, huge moves and markets. Again, everything is driven by the war in the Middle East. Now, the biggest use, of course, is the massive, massive repricing in Central Bank expectations across the world. There was tremendous carnage in the front end. So first off, let's talk about what's happening in the rates market. And secondly, we are seeing some contours as to how this work and end. So let's talk about the latest developments as well. Alright, starting with interest rates. So if you look at the two-year yield in the US and the UK, you can see that this past week has been extraordinary.
Now, looking at the UK, you can see that from the highs to lows, these two-year yield basically went up 100 basis points. The market is now pricing in a few rate hikes from the Bank of England. Now, the Bank of England did meet last week, decided to stand pat and monitor the situation, but the market is becoming increasingly convinced that due to high oil prices, the Bank of England is going to have to do something. Now, the Federal Reserve, you also see the market doing something similar, but not as extreme. The market is pricing in basically not just no cuts this year, but heading into the Middle Eastern War. The market was pricing in a cut or two. Now, the market is pricing in some probability of a rate hike this year.
And so you see the two-year yield also surge. Again, this is something that is seen throughout the world in the European Union, in Japan as well, where the market is widely expecting the Bank of Japan to hike rates the next month. So, according to Central Banking Dogma, what you would do when you have these energy shocks is that you look through them. So, the three-seining being, and this is from their experience back in the 1970s and 80s, is that oil prices go up and down, and up and down. A lot of this Middle Eastern geopolitical stuff is difficult to anticipate.
And so, if you hike rates now, monetary policy acts with the lag. So, maybe when finally the monetary policy is having some kind of impact on the real economy, maybe this is all over. This was a successful way of looking out the world in the Iraq War in 2003, and also Operation Desert Storm, where oil prices spiked tremendously, and totally, totally imploded in a matter of weeks afterwards. So, that's how a Central Bank would normally look at this. And again, there's some nuance to this, because for the US, for example, the Fed is a dual mandate Central Bank. It's full employment and price stability. They can't really focus totally on inflation to begin with.
For other Central Banks, Bank of England and the ECB, it's a different case. They are only thinking about inflation. And sure, I think you can more make a more forceful case about adjusting policy, depending on how you perceive the energy shock. Now, the leading dove on the FOMC has been Governor Waller. He has a very good track record. He's been right about a lot of things born in the past few years. And so, many people looked to him as to what monetary policy could be. So, I think it surprised me and a lot of people that he did not dissent at the last FOMC meeting, the reason being that in January, he dissented citing notable weakness in the labor market and anecdotal reports that maybe we'll have a lot of job loss.
And subsequently, the most recent jobs report showed a big loss in jobs. So, I was thinking that maybe Governor Waller would dissent. He did not. And in his latest public remarks, he tells you why. He is coming along to the view that because labor force projection is projected to not grow this year, that maybe the break-even rate for the unemployment rate is zero. And so, if that's the case, we should not be surprised if there's basically no job growth. Of course, losing jobs is a whole other matter. But that kind of makes the recent job losses a little bit less concerning. So, again, let's hawkish.
And let's hear what he said about the energy shock. I always want to point out that something where the oil goes up and then it comes down. It's very different than oil goes up and then stays there for a long time. That's where you get back to this issue and it bleeds through back into cornflation. And then you do have to kind of respond. You can't just look through it. So, what he's saying is that sure we can look past these temporary spikes. But if this is a structural long-term thing, like the energy prices go up and just stay up, it's eventually going to bleed into everything. And he doesn't think that he could look through that.
Now, that doesn't mean the Fed is going to hike. Again, that full employment mandate is going to be a constraint. But he is strongly suggesting, but at least for now, he's not projecting any cuts. Although he did also note that should the labor market, you know, we can further. And then later on, we have more clarity. He could be open to be advocating rate cuts later in the year. But at the moment, that's that he's going to just wash and see. And so, when you have a leading dove kind of shift like that, the market is now pricing in a much more hawkish policy path.
And again, when you have this huge shift, huge sea change in the stance of central-bank policy, it's going to bleed into a ton of assets. And we see that this past week as well. The S&P 500 did not do very well, broke the 100-day moving average, and even dipped briefly below 6,500. Now, you, other assets like gold also took a pretty big beating. And I think gold is kind of a, I think it's a little bit surprising to many people you'd expect the geopolitical risk to support gold, but at the same time, the dollar strength thing rates are going higher.
And you do see gold losing some key momentum signals, the 50-day moving average, for example. And historically, the 100-day moving average has also been of support. Looks like it lost that as well. So, you could have some technical moves over there. So, there was basically no place to hide in the market the past week. Bonds selling off. Aguri's selling off. Gold's selling off. It was a terrible week in financial assets. And looking across the world, it looks like this is going to continue, unless we get some, finally, get some good news from the war in the Middle East, which is what we'll talk about now.
So, just looking at the oil price, you can see that the oil price just kind of is quite elevated. So, it is volatile with Brent Crude around $110. Basically, it's kind of, doesn't look like it's going down. Now, it's really hard to get news, accurate news of the war. We are, of course, at a time where everyone is in full propaganda mode. You hear over and over again that the US has destroyed all Iran's capabilities, its navies, its launches, its missiles, and so forth. But at the same time, Iran keeps launching missiles, right? So, something's not adding up.
Now, many people, of course, are looking to President Trump to kind of back down. That's what everyone expects him to do. That seems to be what happened in Liberation Day. And on Friday, after the market closed, we had a truth social post from President Trump, suggesting that he's thinking about whiting down the war. And after the market, the markets took that to be some kind of taco and traded very positively. Now, I would be cautious about that because, as we all know, President Trump has been saying a lot of things and a lot of things haven't been adding up.
I think this just stopped. We could go. He was telling everyone that the war was very complete. But since then, the war did escalate. The biggest escalation last week, of course, has to do with attacks on energy production facilities. Now, the straight-up arm moves remains largely closed, and so energy is not going through. But the capacity of the Gulf States to produce hasn't been impacted until last week, when we had an Iranian missile attack on major Qatari gas fields. A Qatar is one of the largest gas producers in the world.
And according to reports, that attack took down their capacity and they may not be able to produce gas at the same capacity for another few years. So that's a structural decline in the capacity of the world to produce gas. So even if the straight-up arm moves were to reopen, fewer gas would flow through. That suggests structurally higher prices. And of course, less economic growth, fewer inputs, fewer outputs. Now, the strike by Iran was in response to Israel's strike on Iranian gas fields. Iran had told everyone that if you strike our energy facilities, we will escalate and we will attack neighboring Gulf facilities. They were attacked, and that's exactly what they did.
And President Trump seems to have panically, panicked in a sense, immediately said that, you know, this is not going to happen anymore. So we do have some degree of detent, mutually extruded destruction over there. But as long as the straight-up arm moves remains closed, it seems like this is just not a solution, and oil prices will continue to drift higher. Now, although the President said that he's thinking about widening down the war, at the same time, we also have reports that he's sending in the Marines. So it looks like Marines are being deployed, and in a week or two, there's going to be a few thousand Marines around Iran, potentially as an option to take Kark Island.
Now, there are some reports suggesting that the President thinks that if he were to take Kark Island, which he perceives to be a major part of Iranian oil infrastructure, and there are oil analysts who disagree with this, maybe he will have more negotiating leverage to try to demand a better deal. That seems to be how he's thinking about it. So in that sense, maybe he's right in saying that the war is winding down. If in his mind he is able to successfully take Kark Island and then demand a resolution, then yeah, maybe the war is almost over. Again, there are three people at this table from his perspective. It doesn't seem like they want to wind down.
Prime Minister Nanyahu is on the record saying that maybe there might be a ground component that might need, and the ground component could be many things. It could be the Iranian people rising up. It could be Marines on the ground and so forth. But it seems unlikely that he would just call it quits. When from a misrespective, it hasn't really completed the mission, right? It hasn't really taken hold of the Iranian or destroyed the Iran's missile capabilities and so forth. So it doesn't seem to me that it's time for him to quit.
Now, from Iran's perspective, we're getting kind of an interesting picture of how the war could end. This morning we have news that Iran and Japan are negotiating for passage through the straight-of-art moves. We also have anecdotal reports that some countries are paying a toll to Iran for passage through the straight. So what could happen for them as a potential endgame is that they retain control of the three-of-a-mouse and everyone can pass, but in order to pass, you got to pay up.
Now, the report suggesting that the payment is actually settled in R&B, so it would be held in the bank in China, say from US sanctions. If that were the case, if Iran were to be able to retain control of the three-of-a-mouse, so it's better scenario for the global economy than it is now, because oil and gas will be flowing. Gas and oil prices will come down. That is great for the global economy and great for many people, who otherwise I think we would have severe threat of actually starvation in poor countries.
But at the end of the day, oil and gas prices will be structurally higher to account for that toll, and Iran will be making money. Iran has been sanctioned heavily throughout by basically everyone, except China and Iran's friends. So it will be able to get some more income, and that will help them economically. And maybe they can paint this as reparations for the damage done and be willing to settle that. However, of course, it seems unlikely that the United States and everyone else in Israel would accept an Iran not just intact, but also collecting toll making money.
Now, Treasury Secretary Scott Besan on Friday actually lifted sanctions on Iranian oil that is at sea, and allowed Iran to sell that that hasn't happened for a very long time. And so, so far at least, it seems like Iran has been able to make money off this conflict. Again, we are in the fog of war. And we are not going to know what's going to happen, but that's just a possible way that this war can end. In the coming weeks, again, every day that this conflict goes on, that's energy that's not being produced, not being sent.
And that raises the risk of a global recession. I personally think that the global economy has already been nuked. We're all just bathing in radiation. And as radiation sickness goes, first you feel fine, then you don't feel fine, and then you die.
So, I think things are not good, and I wouldn't look solely to the stock market as a barometer, because again, markets, the stock market and really calm me, they are related, but they're not the same thing.